Where Are All the Feminists? Amanda Knox’s Story Is about More than Murder

amanda-knox-07_673c5c4d9c267ba5f8b2ecc1740c96d0

Photo Credit: NBC

Where Are All the Feminists? Amanda Knox’s Story Is about More than Murder

By Lisa Marie Basile

Amanda Knox is innocent of murder.

As a reader, you may have already chosen a side, since some have made this a battle of culture and evidentiary ping pong. Either you agree with my assertion of innocence or you don’t, but there’s a bigger social issue at play here: People’s lives are being ruined by sexism and lies.

I am making an appeal to all feminists and people of rational thought: We need to speak out, regardless of our beliefs. Beyond the fact that no credible or realistic evidence places Knox or her then-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito at the scene of Meredith Kercher’s murder, Knox’s very average sexual behavior and our sexualization of her image should not be spearheading the campaign against her.

When I ask people what they think about the case, most of them say, “It’s obvious to me that she is innocent!” yet rarely do people discuss the treatment of Knox or the impact this case will have on others or society in general. Why is it OK to lie to someone about their having HIV only to attain a list of sexual partners which would then be leaked to the media? This is an example of systematic character defamation — the modern equivalent of throwing an accused witch into the lake to see if she drowns. What sort of pain must we put others through in order to forge our own versions of the truth?

Let’s pretend for a moment that Amanda Knox is guilty. Would her sexual partners or attractiveness matter? No. All that would matter is her culpability; you certainly don’t need to be pretty to commit murder. But the fascination and objectification of Knox’s “bad-girl” persona (when purposefully created and pitted against Kercher’s “good-girl” persona) has constructed a sort of cinematic set of lies. Is Italy afraid that a good-looking American girl actually isn’t a threat to the very fabric of modern society? It seems yes.

Knox and Sollecito’s lives will doubtfully be untainted by this miscarriage of justice, but we still can learn from the case. First, though, we should know how not to talk about it.

Just a few days ago, Jezebel — a blog for women — published a piece, “The 12 Ways We Are Amanda Knox.” While the author, Tracie Egan Morrissey, believes Knox is innocent, the article is silly, lazy and downplays the significance of the issue. I have hope that feminist journalists will start taking this case more seriously. I have hope that we will consider the repercussions of sexism when we take to social media to discuss the case. I have hope that we can look past pot and sex.

If that seems judgmental, it’s because we as a society — and perhaps we as feminists — have failed Amanda Knox. People ask me why I care about this case. It is because I am a human and a feminist.

In 2007, Knox was being held in — and consequently convicted to — an Italian prison cell until her 2011 acquittal (she is now convicted again). In 2007, I was in college and I’d seen the headlines — things like Satanic Ritual Gone Wrong and Gory Sex Game Leads to Murder. I remember thinking, this just doesn’t add up. There’s no basis for this assumption! They said she was a liar, which reminded me of a time when I was much younger and dealing with a legal case. While my experience had nothing to do with murder, I was, for all intents and purposes, considered a liar, a young girl with a bad M.O. I was slut-shamed for reporting a child-molester. She has to be lying. She wanted the attention, they said. She made the other girls lie, too.

Why are we, as a society, so quick to sexualize and blame victims on the very basis of gender? Why must we live by some imaginary angel/whore binary?

This case jolts me in other ways as well. As an Italian-American, I am ashamed and saddened that this fiasco has painted, for some, a revolting picture of Italian culture. Italians aren’t barbarians without a sense of logic, but this case isn’t helping the image. The trial of Knox and Sollecito has exacerbated the idea that many Italians are operating a witch-hunt run by stubborn, macho and misogynistic character-assassins. I cannot help but agree.

When Italian authorities celebrated the capture of Kercher’s murderer early on in the trial (due to Knox’s forced false confession, which implicated her employer Patrick Lumumba) the Italian “authorities” were revered as heroes. They had “solved” the case! They had brought justice to poor Kercher, whose bloodied, battered body called for peace. More so, and perhaps more importantly, they had caught the attention of the world, who watched as the small, rustic city of Perugia closed the case on something truly awful.

Couple this false “triumph” (it was not Lumumba after all, but Italy was already boasting) with botched forensic analysis, undeniable Italian nationalism and a bad feeling about a pretty American girl, and you have a media circus.

The prosecution’s theories have changed and morphed over the past seven years; they’ve included sexual and Satanic motives (thanks to Mignini, the God-fearing prosecutor who has been known to use psychics as part of investigations), disputes over housework and personality and a spontaneous desire to kill. Just because the newest claims include a murderous “quarrel” involving stolen money doesn’t mean we should forget the storm of sexism that set the tone for the case.

Just last year CNN journalist Chris Cuomo glibly asked Knox on national television if she is a sexual deviant, and a California porn company offered her $20,000 to star in a sex flick. “As you may have read, and were most likely well aware of, the general consensus is you are absolutely smoking hot,” Michael Kulich, the company’s founder, wrote.

This offer made the news, sure, but the sad matter is that it barely shocked anyone. This is a woman whose life has been turned upside down by a wrongful conviction, and all we can think to do is comment on her looks? If Kulich sat in prison for four years for a crime he didn’t commit, would he think his gesture so clever?

Like all murder cases, the facts should dictate the proceedings. The defendants shouldn’t have to go on trial for their lives, their interests and their sexuality — especially when it doesn’t relate to the crime. But this isn’t a normal murder case. This is an inquisition.

One fact — perhaps the only fact we need to know — is that Rudy Guede murdered Kercher. Another fact is that he partied in Perugia and fled to Germany immediately after the murder. Yet another fact was that his DNA was found on Kercher’s body and in the room, while Knox and Sollecito’s DNA was not. Guede admitted to being at the scene.

The DNA evidence for Guede and lack thereof for Knox and Sollecito isn’t magical or a due to a fantastic bleach-clean-up (you can’t see DNA). These are simply facts that have been ignored, manipulated and lied-about, not only by the court but by lazy reportage.

Asserting that Knox and Sollecito casually, you know, joined a criminal for a night of murder-and oh, yeah, maybe a bloody orgy-defies logic and lacks motive. The “facts” have been manipulated to fit the “theory.” In this case, 2+2=5.

Just look at this list of Knox nicknames. How is it that most revolve around her sexuality, when Guede is most certainly the rapist and murderer? Knox has been called everything from “evil temptress” to “Luciferina” to “she-devil with an angel face.”

Why have we turned her into a filthy, sex-obsessed slut and why aren’t more journalists, writers, advocates and lawyers speaking up about this? Why should Knox have to explain her sexuality to Diane Sawyer?

This seriously flawed case is teaching us that we can be punished for being sexually active or good looking, and that it’s OK to draw parallels between “sexual deviance” and homicide.

This case hinges on not only ignored and circumstantial evidence but preconceived notions and cultural expectations of “the good girl.”

First, there’s the case of Knox’s “offness.” Salon.com writer Tom Dibblee wrote:

What’s compelling to me about Amanda Knox is that it was her slight offness that did her in, the everyday offness to be found on every schoolyard and in every workplace. This is the slight sort of offness that rouses muttered suspicion and gossip, the slight sort of offness that courses through our daily lives and governs who we choose to affiliate ourselves with and who we choose to distance ourselves from.

When people talk about Knox’s reaction, they’re placing a gendered expectation on her: Should she have been weeping publicly and often? Should she not have kissed her boyfriend? Would only a horrible she-devil derive pleasure while her roommate is dead in the morgue?

How we experience and move-through trauma is personal. It is not up to anyone to determine how one should behave during difficult times. Knox was 20 years old, an age somewhere between the never-land of youth and the terror of adulthood. Are we, as women, expected to be sensitive, sad and weak? I rarely hear critics discussing Sollecito’s post-murder behavior. So Knox did a split and kissed her boyfriend? I would have done the same.

All other “evidence” is circumstantial or forced.

A grainy CCTV video, “pale eyes,” a school-aged nickname and a few sexual partners does not a murderer make. Most women I’ve spoken with have indulged in far more drug use and have had far more sex than Amanda Knox has had, but because this is a modern-day witch-hunt we’re talking about, Knox will continue being one of the most slut-shamed people in major media.

When you search “Amanda Knox” on Twitter, you’ll see just how angry, uninformed and irrational some people are.

2014-05-24-KNOX.PNG

Photo Credit: Lisa Marie Basile

And if the public is being fed inaccurate information by the media (because Italy’s judicial system is all about false and circumstantial evidence) they aren’t going to know how to discuss the facts either. Social media has made it easy to report error and exaggerate information, and we should be using it for good. We should be taking a stand against these sexist allegations.

However, sexism isn’t the only problem here. There’s the issue of race — only we’re focusing on the wrong elements.

When people talk about racism and this case, they point to Knox’s naming Patrick Lumumba as murderer. This is understandable without further information. Wrongful convictions based on race are all too common.

We should remember that Knox was interrogated for many hours without food or water. She was slapped and screamed at in Italian — a language she barely understood at the time. When the police found her text message (which said the English equivalent of “goodnight, see you another time”) with Lumumba, they psychologically tortured her and coerced her into confessing that he was involved in the murder. If her text message was sent to anyone else of any race, the same would have occurred. She named him because they named him. More so, false confessions aren’t rare. According to the Innocence Project, “In about 25 percent of DNA exoneration cases, innocent defendants made incriminating statements, delivered outright confessions or pled guilty.”

The real racial issue is this: Perhaps we wouldn’t even be talking about the Knox case if she wasn’t white and beautiful. This world spins on a white, heteronormative, image-obsessed axis, as does the justice system. In 2011, civil rights attorney Lisa Bloom told Larry King Live that society ought to be outraged by fact that pseudo-confessions and scant evidence would prosecute a young black defendant but slide under the radar of major media. Bloom is right. We need to stop paying media attention to only those cases where white is the central color. We need to be open to our flaws as people and as a system in order to jumpstart any change. We can begin by speaking up.

When we learn how to fairly talk about this trial, we will be able to see clearly — or at least as clearly as possible — through the mire Italy has left in its wake.

This essay is reprinted from Luna Luna Magazine with permission of the author.

***

Lisa Marie Basile is the founding editor of Luna Luna Magazine, a progressive arts & ideas site run by women. Her full-length poetry collection, APOCRYPHAL, will be out in 2014. She has written for Billboard, xoJane, Alloy Media, and other publications. She currently works as an online poetry and writing instructor for The Eckleburg Workshops and is the social media manager for the Annual NYC Poetry Festival, produced by The Poetry Society of New York. She holds a Master’s degree in writing from The New School.

This entry was posted in Commentary, Feminism and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Where Are All the Feminists? Amanda Knox’s Story Is about More than Murder

  1. Reblogged this on DiversityJane and commented:
    A great article on conceptions of sexuality and a slightly different take on “missing white woman syndrome.”

  2. ree says:

    Where are all the feminists? In my view, a lot of us are much more concerned about the prison system right here in the U.S., which has the largest and fastest growing rate of female incarceration in the world. Indeed, the rate of incarceration of women in the U.s. is outpacing that of men. That has to do with race, but even more significantly, with class: poverty is endemic in prisons, and both a cause and a generative force in women’s incarceration here. So, I suggest looking far, far beyond Knox and her moneyed defense. Look to the jails and prisons that fill our landscape and that ruin lives forever. There, you’ll find many feminists inside and out, fighting mass incarceration for those most affected which are women of color and the impoverished among us. That’s where the feminists are.

    • kirstensara says:

      I think we risk being a little narrow in our empathy and awareness when we champion ignoring one injustice in favor of another. The very, very broken and f*cked up U.S. incarceration system is a topic worthy of both discussion and protest. It doesn’t mean, however, that we should instead just shrug our shoulders and remain silent over the media’s witch hunt of Knox, whose sexuality somehow became an implication of her guilt.

      • ree says:

        Did not mean to say, nor imply, whatsoever, nor much less advocated – just “shrug shoulders and remain silent over the media’s witch hunt of Knox”. Not at all. Rather I was simply trying to answer the author’s question. I think the history of feminism (good and bad) is closely tied to class, as are these very issues of Knox and incarceration (mass or not). I simply meant I think that’s where a number of feminists are devoting their time and energy: to those who may not have the resources of Knox. I empathize with Knox but I do see she has a publicist, a publisher, appears on national talk shows and has financial backing in this world. I empathize with her, but am devoting my energies for many other women, who are equally demonized but have one iota of that support or exposure. No shrugging of shoulders involved whatsoever in that – just a statement of where many feminists are at, which I understood was the author’s question.

    • L. M. Basile says:

      Those are very real problems too. I wasn’t picking one issue over the other. I was writing about one.

      We can’t all look at the bigger and biggest pictures all the time.

      As far as I’m concerned Knox’s case, simply due to its story and it’s LOUDNESS in media can set the tone for a LOT of change, including the kind you’re talking about. Domestic and internationally. Women are treated poorly. The wrongfully convicted are treated poorly. And the circumstances BY WHICH women are being incarcerated (obviously this case is relevant here) are begging for exploration.

    • L. M. Basile says:

      Those are very real problems too. I wasn’t picking one issue over the other. I was writing about one.

      We can’t all look at the bigger and biggest pictures all the time.

      As far as I’m concerned Knox’s case, simply due to its story and it’s LOUDNESS in media can set the tone for a LOT of change, including the kind you’re talking about. Domestic and internationally. Women are treated poorly. The wrongfully convicted are treated poorly. And the circumstances BY WHICH women are being incarcerated (obviously this case is relevant here) are begging for exploration.

      • ree says:

        and vice versa. but then let’s not lambast those of us who are working on other cases as feminists..instead of Knox’s. Unfortunately, there’s plenty to go around.

  3. Rick Stern says:

    Knox has twice been found guilty of killing another woman. Any person, of any sex, invites scrutiny and speculation of their personal lives with this type of event. I stumbled across this article by accident, but am glad to have located the world’s biggest moron. No one is proclaiming the barbarity of the Italian legal system more than Knox, something the ‘author’ somehow glosses over. More importantly, no sane person can overlook the fomentation of ethnocentrism Knox and her PR people have played to the hilt. AND, the blaming of her former boss was not forced. There are entities know as Consulates and Embassies in this part of the world. Not one American official has stated with evidence that Knox was ‘sweated’ for the scapegoating of an innocent man for murder. Let’s just skip the multiplicity of alibis. I think the Gloria Steinems of the world would rather leave this one to Diane Sawyer.

  4. L. M. Basile says:

    Your thinking is the equivalent of someone watching Cops and thinking they’re a crime journalist. It’s shallow, inexperienced and unable to see grey shades and nuances.

    Diane Sawyer interviewed Knox, and guess what, she, too, exemplified the problems in the case. She slut-shamed her.

    Casey Anthony was found innocent. Do you live your entire life buying into human error?

    Lots of people proclaim the barbaric nature of the Italian system, including Italians, whom I spoke with. There is a real sense of stubbornness in change.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s